Soft point hunting loadsFirearms

Why I Selected the 6.5mm Creedmoor for Deer Hunting?

I recently purchased a new bolt-action rifle chambered for the 6.5mm Creedmoor cartridge and some friends have been asking why I specifically selected that cartridge. So I will attempt to answer that.

I started by making a prioritized list of my requirements and wants for a deer hunting rifle. Here is what I came up with:

  1. Cartridge must be capable of taking medium game at up to 500 yards
  2. Must be a bolt-action rifle with detachable magazine
  3. Preference given to lighter rifles
  4. Preference given to lighter recoiling cartridges
  5. Would be nice to have a cartridge that is also usable for taking large game

With this list in mind, I used some internet wizardry to look for mild recoiling short action cartridges with a healthy variety of factory hunting loads available on the market. I narrowed down the list of cartridges to four options for a detailed comparison: .243 Winchester, 6.5mm Creedmoor, .308 Winchester, and 7mm-08 Remington.

In terms of velocity, all four cartridges perform well and retain sufficient velocities at 400 yards to ensure consistent bullet expansion. At 500 yards, the .308 Winchester and 7mm-08 Remington come in just under the 1800 feet per second threshold for expansion of common soft point hunting projectiles. However, this can be mitigated by selecting hunting loads that use a polymer tip to help initiate expansion. Given this data, I will award 1 point to the .243 Winchester and 6.5mm Creedmoor towards being the winner. The table below summarizes advertised velocity performance of Federal Premium Fusion hunting loads (which I’ve used for comparing cartridges):

.243 Win298027302493226820561854
6.5mm CM275025462350216319851816
.308 Win277025532345214819601782
7mm-08 Rem285026152393218119801791

Next I took a look at energy. I’ve read in many places about the 1000 foot-pounds rule of thumb for dispatching game animals ethically. While there is more to terminal ballistics than this “rule of thumb”, I am applying it to cartridge selection anyway. At 500 yards, the 6.5mm Creedmoor and the .308 Winchester are the two cartridges that advertise more than 1000 foot-pounds of energy. So they are awarded a point each and the 6.5 Creedmoor takes the lead with 2 points. The table below summarizes advertised energy performance of Federal Premium Fusion hunting loads:

.243 Win1873157213111085891725
6.5mm CM235120141717145512251025
.308 Win255521701832153612791058
7mm-08 Rem25252126177914791219997

Next up, a wind drift comparison. To be honest, I’m splitting hairs here. The difference between the best advertised performance of the 6.5mm Creedmoor and the worst advertised performance of the 7mm-08 Remington at 500 yards is 2.2″. The least drift was 22.1″ and the most drift was 24.3″ assuming a 10mph crosswind. This is another win for the 6.5 Creedmoor and therefore increasing its lead over the other options. And here is the wind drift table (smaller number are better):

.243 Win0.
6.5mm CM0.
.308 Win0.
7mm-08 Rem0.

Finally, a drop comparison. The difference in drop is more pronounced than wind drift was. Drop is a result of the time a bullet in flight is exposed to gravity. The less time in flight the less a bullet drops. And the clear winner in this category is the .243 Winchester. It’s the fastest bullet out of the muzzle and the fastest bullet out at 500 yards. The table below summarizes drop for these four cartridges:

.243 Win-1.50.0-3.2-11.9-27.5-51.2
6.5mm CM-1.50.0-3.8-14.1-31.7-58.0
.308 Win-1.50.0-3.8-14.1-31.7-58.5
7mm-08 Rem-1.50.0-3.6-13.3-30.3-56.1

If I managed to keep score correctly, our winner was the 6.5mm Creedmoor with 3 points, followed by .243 Winchester with 2 points, .308 Winchester with 1 point, and 7mm-08 Remington with 0. I suppose I could have also disqualified .308 Winchester and 7mm-08 Remington for falling below 1800 FPS at 500 yards and .243 Winchester for falling below the 1000 ft-lbs at 500 yards. But either way I look at it, the 6.5mm Creedmoor came out on top.

What about recoil? A recoil comparison required some additional internet wizardry with a sprinkling of spreadsheet fairy dust. Felt recoil to some extent is subjective, but one can calculate recoil impulse mathematically by considering the weight of the rifle, weight of the projectile, powder charge weight, and projectile muzzle velocity. Taking the most accurate load data from Nosler’s load data and plugging it into a spreadsheet using a static rifle weight of 5.2 lbs results in 6.5 Creedmoor yielding the lowest recoil, followed by .243 Winchester, then 7mm-08 Remington, and finally .308 Winchester. Yet another win for 6.5 Creedmoor. The following table summarizes my magical numbers:

.243 Win9513.75491.457.63
6.5mm CM14012.82427.486.64
.308 Win15016.62704.7010.94
7mm-08 Rem14016.39698.2310.84

But what about penetration? My research indicates that projectiles with greater sectional density (mass of the bullet divided by the bullet diameter) yields the greatest penetration. This is measured in pounds per inch. I went back into Nosler’s load data and found the sectional density for each of the projectiles used in my recoil impulse calculation and found the following:

CartridgeBullet WeightSectional Density
.243 Win950.230
6.5mm CM1400.287
.308 Win1500.226
7mm-08 Rem1400.248

Lo and behold, yet another win for the 6.5mm Creedmoor. Sure heavier weight bullets will have greater sectional densities, but they will also have greater recoil impulse. But even when looking at the sectional densities of the heaviest Nolser Ballistic Tip projectiles, the sectional densities of the .308 Winchester and the 7mm-08 Remington were less than the sectional density of the 140 grain 6.5mm Creedmoor.

On paper and in my opinion, the clear winner for my priorities in a deer hunting cartridge is the 6.5mm Creedmoor. Will my homework yield good results in the field? I don’t know, but I will find out during this next hunting season.

Update 3/25/2021: The recoil comparison data is incorrect. There was an error in the spreadsheet formula and it turns out all of my recoil numbers I originally posted (and have left intact). I owe Carlos a thank you for pointing out that the recoil numbers were too good to be true. I have revisited the recoil comparison in depth and it turns out the .243 Winchester does have a lower recoil impulse. With that in mind, I still hold the opinion that the 6.5CM is still the clear winner for my needs and has proven itself as the correct choice for me in the field since originally authoring this post.

6 replies »

  1. Yeah, this smelled like a really big stroke-session for the Creedmoor from the start, but it really took an obvious turn when somehow the 6.5 Creedmoor has 50 percent more bullet mass, yes comes up with winning levels of recoil. I truly can’t trust any of your numbers anymore.

    • I wouldn’t trust my number blindly either, I’ve been known to make a mistake or two in my calculations.

      Here is what I can tell you. The numbers are what they are. Could I have made a mistake? Yes. Since posting this over a year ago, I’ve spent plenty of time behind the 6.5CM and I can say that to me it feels like a softer recoil impulse than the .243 and the .308. Can’t speak to the 7mm-08 because I’ve yet to have any trigger time with it. And again, this is subjective.

      I’m not trying to convince folks that the 6.5CM is superior to the others, this post was just my reasoning for my purchase. As I said, on paper (assuming I didn’t make any significant errors in my calculations) and in my opinion, the clear winner was the 6.5CM for my parameters. Your mileage may vary.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.